Prtg vs zabbix reddit 3 out of 5. Categories. If something within the Zabbix agent or server breaks it won't matter if you're using Apache or nginx to host the front end, and if something within your HTTP server breaks you don't need to rely on the Zabbix community to fix it. . Solwarwinds Orion (SAM,NPM) vs Nagios Is there any reason you would not choose Orion over say a Nagios or a Zabbix? and bought PRTG. Zabbix: Is open-source monitoring really cheaper than PRTG? At first glance, “free” software like Zabbix seems like a good deal compared to PRTG. Zabbix is a good choice for large Why should someone install Zabbix over CheckMK, Nagios, PRTG, SolarWinds, or any other similar tool? Why should someone install another product instead of Zabbix? I Here's a Comparison of PRTG vs Zabbix: Automatic Network Scanning: Zabbix and PRTG both support this. IMO, Zabbix is kinda crap. It turned out that there're no properly working templates for my hardware which I use most often (MikroTik), so I tried to make them. Yes Zabbix has a steep learning curve in order to maximize the capabilities that it offers. Similar price point with much more scalability and flexibility. It has some logging capability but definitely isn't a traditional SIEM. Price isn't really an issue as WUG isn't the cheapest option out there, but currently my top picks would be CheckMX and Zabbix. Even tools like Nagios/Ichinga/Zabbix can be setup to alert on a specific link down, or an upstream link in the path between probing server and endpoint. Your imagination is the limit. Found a great unifi template that has been pretty spot on. Paessler PRTG vs Zabbix. Zabbix in my opinion is super easy, just install the server and then agents (apt install zabbix-agent) and give the agents the ip address of server and you're done. However it does mean that you can let Zabbix monitor EVERYTHING. I also prefer zabbix's dashboards and panic boards. Not really related but last year I helped moving a network from Zabbix to PRTG. Question Im going to do a proyect for my associate degree using a monitorization tool and I looked up options and ended up having but stuck with PRTG. EDIT: Clarified my opinion on PRTG I know its They'll both do the job. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up, and doing business with checkmk overall. It appears PRTG is dogshit compared to Zabbix. I prefer the traffic graphs in Librenms. However, if you run patches, or add/remove modules, or do a port breakout, they do change - and then all your graphs are For Prometheus, we replaced PRTG graphs with Grafana dashboards which are considerably more flexible (especially when compared to PRTG maps which will give you nightmares). It may help you identify some weaknesses in your environment. I felt the lack of support for a PRTG remote probe to be installed on a linux box a bit of a letdown but the Zabbix remote monitoring (Zabbix Proxy) works really well. Between Zabbix Share and GitHub there is quite a bit of templates you can use to quickly get your monitoring started. PRTG Reply reply ambscout Zabbix is a popular open-source monitoring system that can monitor networks, servers, applications, and services. Centreon. vivek kumar. Just looking for something simple and easy to see all my devices health quickly. Compare PRTG vs Zabbix. Nagios on the other hand I have never been able to get used to :( But then again, this is the only company I have worked for where A) I actually care about the monitoring alerts, including warnings and B) they're running a pretty vanilla nagios as opposed to the customized ones at We use Zabbix - great system and very flexible in deployment and ability to monitor anything. To say the least, I feel overwhelmed. Jun 8, 2020 | 6 upvotes · 765. PRTG vs. It's pretty old-school and a pain to setup and maintain. 6 stars with 318 reviews. I think, I don't wanna run it like that permanently 'cause sometimes getting data from the Zabbix data source is taking too long. Eventually, when 7. Hi guys, I'm trying to use netflow protocol but my PRTG unable to show Netflow traffics from my Mikrotik router(10. We've got a powerful automation framework for running scripts, restarting services, rebooting machines, etc and we've recently added text Our equipment fortunately is bog standard so I haven't had to deal with mib imports. Microsoft, or iTunes vs. The only problem is either I'm stupid or lazy or it's really clunky to configure. Get Price Quote. As for Telegraph and Influx, definitely a worthy choice worth investigating but take a Normally when something is massively cheaper you will be losing some functionality. Zabbix is the ultimate enterprise-level software designed for real-time monitoring of millions of metrics collected from tens of thousands of servers, virtual machines and network devices. The only slight problem is that the server is a bit resource intensive. When compared to Auvik, for instance, we prefer PRTG as it offers immediate notifications through the desktop client - not limited to email notifications as with Auvik. The Zabbix agent isn't strictly necessary either depending on what you're monitoring and what interfaces it outputs data on. But I don't know: Zabbix feels a little bit "unmodern". x) via the Zabbix official repos, which upgrades, well, everything-- nginx, zabbix, DB, and all things zabbix. ManageEngine OpManager (120) 4. I really like, not love, Zabbix and that's because I get what I pay for, nothing! My advice would be to start again. I would consider PRTG combined with AutoMonX Azure sensor pack A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Menu Close. Management can pay the $110/mo for PRTG that you already have setup or pay more than that in the first month with your salary by the time you get Zabbix setup and tweaked to something relatively useful. Why should someone install Zabbix over CheckMK, Nagios, PRTG,. It works great, but I'm coming to the Freebie edition's limits in my home lab (100 sensors). There are many other reasons I don't like PRTG, just my $0. PRTG has had its quirks as of late, and is proving to be resource-heavy on a windows server, in addition to requiring more hands-on troubleshooting from our in-house teams. Edit1: I just realized I misread your statement. If reddit's search isn't working for you, use google: +1 for Zabbix, while it may take a bit more time to setup and configure than PRTG, it fit our use case better which is a large amount of remote monitoring. We are running Zabbix some months for testing and the features that do the same like PRTG are more complex but with time you are able to obtain. We install this week integration with Datadog. CheckMK is as easy as it gets. Now trying out PRTG again years later. prtg is also doing a good job, but i don't really like the 100 sensors free license limit. 0. other network monitoring software There’s no better alternative to our powerful network monitoring tool . We have already checklist of characteristics we are considering. 4 stars with 247 reviews. Windows Media Player, orwell. I use CheckMK at my current work place and it reminds of very much of this. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Paessler PRTG easier to use, set up, and administer. 5 out of 5. Welcome to r/IOTA! -- IOTA is a scalable, decentralized, feeless, modular, open-source distributed ledger protocol that goes 'beyond blockchain' through its core invention of the blockless ‘Tangle’. Takes only a few minutes, as it's entirely self-contained on the server side. Reply reply PRTG has a free version up to 100 sensors that includes just about any type of monitoring. For The main things we use PRTG for are network hardware up status and traffic monitoring (through put relative to negotiated link), security camera up status and server monitoring (firewall, How does PRTG compare to Zabbix? PRTG and Zabbix are both monitoring solutions, but PRTG is a commercial solution with a focus on real-time data collection and a comprehensive set of monitoring sensors, while Zabbix A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Impenetrableee. It's dead easy to use and configure, especially if you're a Figure out how to get some more eyeballs on your configuration (or your environment), and zabbix, or prtg or(shudder) SCOM or just about any mainstream monitoring software will do you well. So, I learned about Zabbix and decided to give it a shot. My apologies. The execs loved it because of the reporting tools and features, They are quite different, Zabbix is for monitoring and Grafana is for visualization. I’ve used it in 3 of my last 4 jobs so I feel like it’s a good idea to keep up with the developments in it. I'm use to using SolarWinds NPM, but recently I've been researching LibreNMS, Zabbix, Prometheus + Grafana, Telegraf + Influx + Grafana and some look very good. Checkmk, however, provides a more streamlined experience, making it ideal for organizations Integration: Zabbix supports integration with a variety of third-party tools, including Nagios, PRTG, and Grafana. It's very intuitive. We primarily use PING sensors, and a few firewall throughput sensors, but nothing too crazy. Advice on PRTG and Zabbix. ADMIN MOD Librenms vs Zabbix . PRTG Network Monitor. I've used zabbix extensively and prtg only in my most recent position. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your organization. I know you have your issues with zabbix but with a few commands and configs, I had Zabbix monitoring all MS servers in under 1hr. AlienVault OSSIM is more or less a GUI built around their threat intelligence offerings. If you look at the generations of monitoring systems over the last 20 years you have things like Cacti and Nagios as the first gen. Edit: I would add that PRTG is one of the often recommended monitoring solutions in the sub, I don't believe I've ever seen Check_MK mentioned. I have nagios installs out in the wild at companies I no longer work for that have been working uninterrupted for In Summary, PRTG and Zabbix differ in scalability, ease of use, alerting and notifications, monitoring capabilities, integration and APIs, as well as licensing model. 02. Members Online • nihl_13. This makes for an easier deployment and less firewall adjustments to allow traffic to cloud PRTG vs Zabbix. Forum/reddit and so on, to make it work, is not that enterprise friendly. Also I haven't yet figured out if I can/how to setup port/service monitoring on Librenms so PRTG wins that one too. Find the best posts and communities about Zabbix on Reddit. Grafana was also nice once set up, but needed a lot of tweaking just to figure out how to get the data displayed the way you wanted. The Zabbix item prototypes are simply awesome when you know how to create them and work with them. Distributed monitoring is also easy: you can have a zabbix proxy in your LAN and a zabbix server in the cloud: zabbix proxy gets the configuration from server and performs item checking in your LAN, forwarding results to the server. LibreNMS looks nice (a little nice than Zabbix to me), but I am afraid that I'm going to run into the same thing. Zabbix (188) 4. org) others will "swear" by zabbix, prtg or something completely different. Monitoring: Zabbix, Log Shipping: Fluentbit, Log Storage: Loki,Log Analysis: Grafana. I'm a fan of zabbix and libreNMS ( has nagios plugin ) and if you want something that just works but is limited compared to zabbix or libreNMS, nagios is fine. Monitor your entire IT infrastructure with a single tool; Get a cost-effective solution with all monitoring features included; PRTG alternatives such as SolarWinds or Nagios in direct comparison I've used both Zabbix and Nagios in the past and have always found Zabbix to work well for me. I work in a company where we have WhatsUp Gold, Nagios, and PRTG licenses Main advantage of WhatsUp Gold is that it's the easiest of all 3 to get started, A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Nagios has some light variant. Add. Not so good for monitoring Windows. Great for monitoring network devices and everything that has SNMP (Printers, switches, routers, Server Hardware). We also appreciate the fact that PRTG can be self/on-prem hosted vs Auvik's cloud model. Reviewers felt that Paessler PRTG meets the needs of I suggest Zabbix -> Website! 100% Free, open source and rock solid, while there is commercial support available if wanted, but not necessary. I would recommend anybody who wants to use Zabbix take a look at all the Played with Zabbix, went back to Nagios because I use Centreon, which really makes Nagios management trivial anyone that isn't a script wiz and isn't using a nice GUI like Centreon is just asking for the difficulty they have. We found getting set up with Zabbix to be relatively easily actually. 18. With the rise of cloud computing, traditional network monitoring methods have become ineffective. I have several PRTG instances installed so far, and one Zabbix. I prefer NetXMS (netxms. We use PRTG. Outages Due to G5 Solar Storm upvotes Zabbix vs Solarwinds upvotes We are considering moving from our existing system to another monitoring tool. Zabbix is really great but needs some attention regarding updates, database etc. When comparing Zabbix and Checkmk, several key differences emerge: Scalability and Complexity: Zabbix excels in handling large-scale environments with its efficient data collection and great storage mechanisms. If setup properly, they can tell you if it is a firewall interface, ISP gateway, or something in between. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. They both perform essentially the same task and meet the same goals, but they do it rather differently. ADMIN MOD Netdata vs. I got around the sensor limit by creating two PRTG instances. There's tons of OSS monitoring solutions it there, LibreNMS, Nagios, Zabbix, Icinga, CheckNK, Prometheus, OpenNMS. New comments When considering a network monitoring tool for your IT infrastructure, Zabbix and Paessler PRTG are two prominent options, and we'll explore which one is right for your needs. Zabbix is better hands down, better discovery, low level discovery, very little need to ever configure anything manually once your're up and running> PRTG has a licence limit and has limited discovery. I thought you were saying the alerting in Zabbix was lacking. One of the most deployed things right now could also be UNMS for Ubiquiti gear and The Dude from MikroTik, i recommend neither :) If you want to learn how it works on a general basis, pull down one or two, set it up and play. Based on verified reviews from real users in the Infrastructure Monitoring Tools market. It really depends what you want. Support isn't the greatest IMO. Paessler PRTG Network Monitor is one of the leading IT infrastructure monitoring tools. API integration much better . Pfsense has a zabbix proxy package, for example. It's got a learning curve, but it's not too bad. The kicker is that it needs to me Open Source because the company doesn't want to spend money on PRTG which is what I was going to go with originally. I have it on a 15 sec slide show showing the RAM/CPU/NET traffic/Firewall on their own respective screen. I need to compare PRTG 2500 with Ops Manager and pick one. Zabbix is praised for its user-friendly interface and customizable features, while Nagios XI is known for its reliability and open-source nature. Having setup zabbix and prtg myself, I didn't particularly enjoy it. When it comes to "Zabbix uses some% resources which is way more / less then product xyz" this is such a weird thing to say. Skip to main content. It's a piece of cake to setup. Zabbix is a network monitoring tool. Zabbix is open source and free. x comes out, and won't run on RHEL 8, I'm sure you'll be laughing-- but at some point you'll have to upgrade the VM's hosting your docker containers. Team is finally gaining ground in unfncking the mess that the previous MSP left in our environment A Reddit for Machinists of all varieties. Also includes netflow which the other commercial products like to charge special for. Zabbix and Graphite as second gen. PRTG vs WUG vs LogicMonitor . 8. Zabbix is a free infrastructure monitoring system that can I would Google Zabbix + the things you want to monitor to see what's out there. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Paessler PRTG easier to use and administer. Nagios has a rating of 4. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Paessler PRTG overall. Nagios, Zabbix, PRTG are basically all 3 the same, do the same thing. Built a fair amount of custom sensors for ourselves, they make those easy. What are your thoughts on PRTG and would you use it or replace or combine with some mentioned above. PRTG Network Monitor offers Prometheus is "similar" to Zabbix, at least that it's a proper metrics-based monitoring system. This for a Windows domain environment. (I am biased since i'm working as consultant/trainer for the product Zabbix, so if you want more info, let me know!) Came here to tell you to invest the time and effort into setting up Zabbix. Which is better for a small ISP where we mainly monitor network devices from Cisco and Juniper?, we need an alerting system, graphing, syslog, dashboard and user control. This all depends, if you have Linux admins, Absolutely, I used PRTG at the last job & we use Solarwinds NPM at this one, we're probably buying PRTG here instead of expanding the Solarwinds deployment to include the Server & Application monitoring component. PRTG does not require a client “agent” program installed on remote machines for data collection, whereas Check Capterra to compare PRTG and Zabbix based on pricing, features, product details, and verified reviews. on. I do something non standard and have Agents and Fluentbit on each of my Docker containers pointing to a proxy service on each host which then are in charge of getting it up to the central services. RMM for windows, Zabbix for Having fiddled with Nagios, PRTG years ago, and now installed this and realized it is not good enough. Members Online • yasharn. LogicMonitor (602) Zabbix is the ultimate enterprise-level software designed for real-time monitoring of millions of metrics collected from tens of thousands of servers, virtual machines and network devices. 90)the PRTG is inside a VM, when I do traceroute to the PRTG probs iface it shows me 100. PRTG is What specifically did you find lacking with Zabbix? I find Zabbix to be way more powerful than PRTG and would prefer it over PRTG any day of the week. Switched from Zabbix to CheckMK to reduce admin effort. I'm not sure why you think Nagios costs $4k, because it's absolutely free. PRTG is also popular and free for less than 100 sensors. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to I'm simply curious to know how much you guys A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. With that said, being on Zabbix and not ever worrying about licensing, I'd never go back to PRTG. But I prefer the summary layout of prtg. Zabbix is open source and offers more features and flexibility, while PRTG is more user-friendly and easier to set up. We have fine tuned it to our specific needs, and it seems to be working well. 426 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. Zabbix is database driven, Nagios lives in flat-files. If you don't need all the tools solarwinds offers then might be worth asking for a 60 day / 30 day test. We are using now integration with Grafana for customized Dashboard and Dynamic flow maps. You can start free OSI -- for small-medium environments that will work well -- then as you get larger you would look at pay options. They said I can use PRTG or put in my own monitoring system. Zabbix is not as straightforward, but results are much better IMO. I've broken it a few times and had to start from scratch again but I like the monitoring options it gives me. -monitoring specialist in a 2000vm environment , and now an admin in That said, they're Apple vs. 3K views . Paessler PRTG vs checkmk. Additionally, it supports integration with cloud platforms such as Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. We looked at all the options and deployed Zabbix within a couple of months. There are plenty of PRTG alternative network monitors to consider. I found out that they currently own PRTG 2500 license whos renewal is coming up next week, also Manage Engine - Desktop Manager renewal is coming up which hasn't been utilized, but that doesn't include Ops manager yet although I can buy it. PRTG is cheaper, has more out of the box sensors, and is a lot more flexible than Solarwinds. How-to, tips, Zabbix is the ultimate enterprise-level software designed for real-time monitoring of millions of metrics collected from tens of thousands of servers, A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. CheckMK was also a nice free option, and it was really good at discovering devices. Using it, on the other hand, has a steep learning curve. PRTg licensing has come up, along with a need for more sensors. Zabbix/Grafana is a nice free option, but I found Zabbix to need quite a bit of tweaking depending on what devices you are importing. I use PRTG in the homelab. Paessler PRTG vs. Also consider zabbix. I'd suggest you to try another option: CheckMK Personally, after trying Zabbix and CheckMK, I choose Compare : Nagios XI vs Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor. Zabbix: Shiny new invention with pretty dashboards. Zabbix has a rating of 4. Just find one that suits your needs. The idea is to have the PRTG or Zabbix probe at the remote site so we can still capture data and hope to find a reason for the issue when the remote syncs back up with the NOC. 1. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Something like the plugin-based polling tools that telegraf offers might be ideal for you, but there are limitations and you'll have to build the performance metrics yourself. From Old School conventional guys, to CNC Programmers, to the up and coming next generation. Needs advice. Zabbix is Open Source and comes at no cost. We have the same setup in place. I've tried many, many different solutions, my three favorites are CheckMK, PRTG, and Zabbix are usually more prefered for support and that you have someone that knows it better then you to ask. I believe that with PRTG you can still install the software and monitor 100 sensors for free. Prometheus, Wondering about Zabbix vs PRTG vs LibreNMS vs Other?? Right now I am fighting some network congestion issues somewhere in my core and cacti is not giving me all the details I need to locate the congestion. As a network administrator, monitoring the network is crucial to ensure smooth operation, troubleshoot issues, and prevent downtime. Reviews are generated by real users. When reviewing a product, users are asked to assess the product’s overall quality, which includes assigning specific ratings for ease of use, value for money, customer support, and functionality. Zabbix vs PRTG: A Comparison of Network Monitoring Solutions for Enterprises. 2 which is a firewall router in the middle of it, but I can ping the prob's iface from my mikrotik router, any help? It seems to be a nice monitoring tool overall. No idea what OPManager is, but Zabbix is a network monitoring software. We do our security updates via RPM (Zabbix is on RHEL 8. When looking for the differences between PRTG vs Zabbix, in terms of Network, Server and Infrastructure monitoring, we want to evenly consider the benefits, pros & cons and strengths/weaknesses of each I switched to Zabbix to get better SNMP data. Grafana can create dashboards from all kind of data sources. The cost may be if you want support. It’s a bit clunky but I had a logical divide (IT infra vs IoT/smart home tech) so it worked. According to the PRTG pricing page costs for monitoring about 50 devices is in the hundreds. It's more akin to Solarwinds/PRTG and focuses on device statistics and uptime. My main gripe with Zabbix is that the default templates all assume that snmp index numbers never change. 300 Euro for 500 sensors. To get a simple server install use the docker version. Add to Compare. Archived post. It also supports integration with external scripts, like Python, Perl, or Shell. PRTG showed exactly what I wanted, If you're demoing PRTG you should check out NetCrunch as well. There are so many Templates for Zabbix because Open Source, while no one is willing to open source There are probably no major functional differences between nagios/Zabbix and PRTG. I invested quite some time to get all my devices monitored the way I wanted to. To try to get monitoring parity with Zabbix was going to be a huge undertaking, and porting a lot of our scripts. Still want to have others give me their own suggestions and opinions. However, I am curious about what characteristics that Zabbix has that makes you feel it is better than other tools. Members Online. I haven't done it myself, but you can use Grafana if you want cooler looking graphs than what Zabbix provides, though Zabbix's own newer graph widget is also pretty slick. I took a look on Grafana (with Zabbix as data source) and it's made awesome. When it comes to monitoring other servers though, it's actually about as easy as it gets with Zabbix. Check_MK is 600 Euro for 3000 services, PRTG is approx. As a classic Windows admin, I would Zabbix and PRTG are both popular network monitoring tools. The extra work can be with integrating SNMP targets, and other devices that don't already have templates built. Installed PRTG at the start of the year both at home and at work. Android (or Apple vs. I also have been testing Zabbix but I find its not as streamlined as PRTG, they don't have a PING sensor like PRTG does so it kind of ruins the experience. If you are in a landscape with windows and linux. However, it will likely cost you more in the long run in terms of wasted hours, PRTG is like Zabbix, except Zabbix is free. Have no complains, only good things to say. PRTG. But it's extremely rewarding, as it can monitor just about anything, scales from a raspberry pi to FAANG-scale. I'm a long time user of PRTG in the work place and in my home lab. ADMIN MOD Zabbix vs Checkmk . Search. you get the idea). When I monitor APs in PRTG it's just ping because I don't enjoy headaches. User Ratings & Reviews. Zabbix for monitoring infrastructures and services . Now I'm thinking about switching completely to Grafana. Helping businesses choose better software since 1999 When considering a network monitoring tool for your IT infrastructure, Zabbix and Paessler PRTG are two prominent options, and we'll explore which one is right for your needs. 81), and the probe's interface is(10. Key Differences between Zabbix and Checkmk. Zabbix. lol And I don't care so much about using an Agent, as Zabbix requires ones on Windows machines and Linux. I built my Zabbix server from scratch on a virtual Debian box. pemh vgshw rnmq kdyzg rzj bpouyp bios spmwyci ywut xucx